Something Wicked This Way Comes

Zakari’s MAKERS video

Posted in Uncategorized by Christina Jenkins on December 2, 2013

christinas.

Posted in Uncategorized by Christina Jenkins on September 24, 2009

IMG_2540IMG_2541

The elechristina is a relative of the elepanda. It’s also a vessel for a domain map. The story on the right is title-less, and explores bigness and littleness. When I was little, I felt like I was big – all serious and wanting to sit at the adult table. In bigness, it seems that littleness is returning a bit. (See elechristina.)

if she is falling apart

Posted in Uncategorized by Christina Jenkins on September 24, 2009

if she is falling apartis an apple still an apple

IMG_2539

These are pages from a story I wrote this spring after reading the story about a teacher who disappeared for three weeks and was diagnosed with dissociative fugue after she was discovered. The idea that one can disappear, voluntarily or involuntarily, is fascinating to me. I was also interested in the Theory of Forms, and about what constitutes a ‘______-ness.’ Apple-ness, Christina-ness, our essence. How much of it can disappear before we are not we? I created it during Andrea Dezso’s book design class. It’s still unbound.

Cyb/urbanism.

Posted in thesis by Christina Jenkins on July 5, 2009

So much for 1:1. Round two. I think I’m too slow (with words, with thinking) for blogging. Or, undisciplined.

File Not Found.A few months ago, Jacob was telling me about this idea of online blight. Abandoned URLs, neglected web sites, content that hangs in this kind of digital purgatory (inbetweenspace, not hell-like) between life and non-life. Would my own blog have been that, if I’d let it be forgotten? I’ve been thinking about the similarities and differences between how our habits play out in cities and online. Urban “blight” (a term that sounds like the 70s to me) also implies poverty and graffiti and brownness (not whiteness). Is there really an online equivalent, or are we just talking about 1996 web design? (And if we are, I’d like to see it – not via the wayback machine, but truly abandoned web sites, with rotating gifs and all.) Or, is there actually a situation of, say, online squatting here? It seems that there’s a phenomenon of registering domains, eventually abandoning them, and returning to find them taken over by spammers.

And then, more – thanks, Paul. A few days ago, Danah Boyd gave a talk about how the migration from MySpace towards Facebook represents a white flight, and signals the ghettoization of a space that’s been abandoned by the rich, white and educated. And sure enough, there’s that language again: Facebook as safer (“predators” live in MySpace, apparently), cleaner (design-wise), classier (used for networking, instead of dating or finding sex).

So are these new media things – in this case, social networking sites – all about democratization, or do they embody the habits we tend to exhibit in the non-cyber world? (See tech determinism vs. the social construction of technology.) I have the same trouble with Danah Boyd as I do with Malcom Gladwell and other people I distrust because I tend to agree with them too quickly. (I used her work at Berkeley when I was thinking about Alice.) But, there it is, and I’m wondering if this idea of a digital divide – which, in the world of ed/tech, refers to the access to technology that’s also characterized by richness, whiteness, geography, etc – will move, at least in the United States, from being a problem of access to one of segregated cyber spaces.

1:1

Posted in studio by Christina Jenkins on November 30, 2008

30max190v(post:month)

😦

There’s a piece by James Gleick in this Sunday’s NYT about the future of books. He weighs in on the conversation we’ve had several times about the consequences of technology for physical objects. Remember bicycles? Right. His argument is that books are perfectly suited to the task they’re intended for – reading print – in the same way that hammers and bicycles are. So, he predicts that books will not go extinct in the same way that the phonograph did and CDs will, because those devices are good for something (projecting sound) that other things can do better. Books, though, are the best way of reading print.

That isn’t to say that they’re the best way of communicating information. Obviously, he writes, telephone books and encyclopedias are dead; they’ve been reinvented, in a better way, online. And, related to Google’s scan-every-book-in-the-world project, books that were previously relegated to a dead zone between public domain and bookstores (that is, books that are out of print but not yet copyright-free) may now see a new life if they’re made available online.

So I think Gleick’s point is that books aren’t going anywhere. Changing, yes (some of them might be reincarnated online) but that just frees the book from mass-market obligations. The book won’t be interested in mass appeal, cheapness or comprehensiveness – the Internet is good at that. Let’s instead think about what the book is good for.

I’m so optimistic!

Tagged with: ,

Taking pictures of pictures.

Posted in studio by Christina Jenkins on October 21, 2008

Moving on to our second studio project: I’m working with Michael and Iva, and we’re looking at the park in DUMBO between the Manhattan and Brooklyn Bridges. We’ve been studying the site and are proposing a few different concepts for public space projects. My own idea comes out of the most-photographed-barn-in-America problem, which I’m sure has been articulated in a thousand different ways but which I read about in DeLillo’s White Noise. DeLillo writes about two of his characters who visit the most photographed barn in America, and one notes that the tourists who are taking pictures there can’t help but “take pictures of pictures.” That is, we – the picture-takers – have bestowed on this barn the very celebrity that makes us want to take pictures of it in the first place. What? So we see the same thing in Paris (is that whole city a picture of a picture?), or the Empire State Building, or whatever. We also see it in this park (officially, the Fulton Ferry State Park), with visitors taking pictures of (and maybe not even taking pictures of, just facing) the Manhattan waterfront.

So that – the most-photographed-barn-in-America – has become the challenge for us to overcome at this site, and our first response to that involves hiding Easter eggs that include “information” (stories, pictures?) about the landscape across the water. I’m not completely set on this yet; I think it needs to be rethought before we start going into different iterations. It’s pretty important to me to see the value in this project myself (and not just shrug, and say hey, I’m not the typical user, but someone would do it …), and I’m not quite there yet. I’ve started thinking about the water, and our relationship to it – as New Yorkers who live on islands, as park-goers who skip over it to admire those buildings on the Manhattan side, as tourists who don’t see the water when we see it.

You are what you eat.

Posted in studio by Christina Jenkins on September 11, 2008

So our first assignment in studio:interface was to create a self portrait. Any medium, any scale, etc. Mine’s below. I was thinking about what kind of image, aside from a straight-up realistic picture, would, well, invoke me. What can do that better than icons of my nine favorite foods? I do eat more adult items, but these nine all make me really happy whenever I can get my hands on them. From the top left to right, those are: Kraft Singles processed cheese slices; a McDonalds’ filet-o-fish; a corndog; a bahn mi (vietnamese sandwich); a burrito (of any sort); mayonnaise; a chrysanthemum tea juice box;  Kraft macaroni and cheese; and Totino’s frozen party pizza, which I can’t locate anywhere in New York City.

Tagged with: ,